Monterey county property tax records
At the time the contract, deed, or other document creating the subject parcel was signed, the subject parcel complied with the applicable County ordinances then in effect, including the parcel size required by the then applicable zone district; and. This is entirely within the regulatory environment adopted by Monterey County, as demonstrated in the citations listed below:.
- phone book for cedar rapids iowa.
- find a mobile number by name.
- louisiana marriages after world war 2.
- vinyl record resale in illinois!
- 58 Counties. 13 Million Parcels.;
Chapter Additional residential units to a maximum of 4 on any lot and not exceeding the zoning density of the property. Second residential units not exceeding the zoning density of the property;. Additional residential units to a maximum of 4 units per lot, and not exceeding the zoning density of the property. Second residential unit not exceeding the zoning density of the property;.
Additional residential units to a maximum of 4 units per lot not exceeding the zoning density of the property. Two values are assigned to each parcel in the County - a land value and an improvement value. While the land value speaks to the approximate value of the actual land, the improvement value speaks to the approximate value of anything added to the land, such as structures. If the improvement value is zero, and the parcel is not publicly owned, the parcel has no structures built upon it.
Second, the list of vacant parcels was then refined to identify parcels with land use designations identified as having a residential capability. These included the following the County Assessor's land use designations:. Third, each vacant parcel in the new listing was reviewed against the Assessor's hard-copy maps to determine the number of lots it contained.
- mn birth and death records!
- numbers on a birth certificate.
- death number record security social.
- free warrant checks and background checks.
- Monterey: BOE-267-L1.
- Municode Library?
- consumer reports on vehicles in canada.
These lots were then reviewed against the Assessor's legal description of each parcel and against recorded subdivisions and surveys please see the section above on determining legal lots of record. Any lots not having been properly recorded were removed from the total of available vacant lots. An appellate court reviews this decision de novo.
Dennis v. County of Santa Clara, supra, Cal. When reviewing a particular method's application, the trial court reviews the entire record to determine if the board's findings are supported by substantial evidence. Our role is identical to that of the trial court. Gilmore Co. County of Los Angeles Cal. Having clarified the applicable standard of review, we turn to Firestone's argument. It complains that the board should have considered evidence that the plant was not economically viable as a tire manufacturing facility on the assessment date, and should not have been valued as such.
It contends the board determined that the expert opinions Firestone proffered on this subject were irrelevant because the assessor had no knowledge of the possibility that the plant would close. It argues it was entitled to present independent evidence of the property's value regardless of what the assessor knew or should have known on March 1, The board found the assessor was not required to consider information it obtained after the March 1st lien date but before the actual placement of the valuation on the tax roll on June 2.
We concur in the trial court's conclusion that Firestone's real dispute with the board was not over procedure, but over its failure to adopt Firestone's premise that the property should not be valued as a tire manufacturing plant. We also agree with the trial court that substantial evidence supports the board's conclusion that it was reasonable for the assessor to value Firestone's plant as a going concern. Assistant assessor Gene Haller testified that as of March 1, , the plant was a fully functioning industrial plant operating at near capacity with three shifts of workers. When it closed in , it was placed on the market for thirty-one million dollars.
Supervising auditing assessor Joe Pitta testified that Firestone acquired over two and a half million dollars' worth of furniture and equipment for the plant in the fourteen months prior to the plant closing. In the three years prior to , Firestone had spent almost 10 million dollars for equipment for the plant. He also noted that the Salinas plant was a distribution as well as a production facility, and that in bias tires still represented forty-four per cent of the industry's output.
Firestone's experts' valuation was based on a hypothetical sale of the property, not as a tire manufacturing and distributing plant, but as a building subdivided for other uses.
It should have been based, however, on the plant's use as an ongoing business, as it was in March In this instance, the appraiser must visualize a market composed of people who would use the property in a manner similar to the way the present owner uses it, unless it is clearly apparent that the market would adapt it to a more profitable use.
It is apparent from the evidence presented to the board that anyone but an expert in tire industry economics would have considered the Firestone plant, prior to the closure decision, as a well-capitalized, viable entity.
Bid4Assets: Monterey County, CA Tax Defaulted Properties Re-Offer
We are satisfied, after reviewing the record, that substantial evidence supports the trial court's implied conclusion that a reasonable person, acting reasonably, might well have valued Firestone's property in the same manner as the assessor. This is all that is required. Monterey County has cross-appealed, challenging the trial court's conclusion that the cost of cleaning up pollution at the plant reduced its fair market value, and that the board was required to determine the appropriate reduction in this value and reduce the property's assessed valuation accordingly.
The county advances several novel arguments in support of its position that we should overturn the trial court on this issue. We agree with the county that the trial court's order on this issue should be reversed. Although the grounds for our reversal do not fall squarely within the parameters of the county's arguments, we will discuss a number of its arguments. Irrespective of whether the hazardous waste problem at the Salinas plan[t] occurred by negligence, design or pure accident, the corporate entity is responsible for the cost of doing business within the limitations imposed by law.
The cost of hazardous waste cleanup is not chargeable against individual corporate assets, but is instead a cost of doing business, to be borne by the corporate stockholders. To acc[ede] to [Firestone's] line of reasoning would require the taxpayers of Monterey County to support the cost of cleanup in the form of reduced taxes resulting from a reduced assessment. Such a result appears contrary to the very nature of environmental pollution control laws. No relevant statutory or case law applicable to the facts of these appeals has been cited by [a]pplicant to support its contention in this regard.
The trial court took issue with this finding, and concluded that it was not supported by substantial evidence. It cited Firestone's offer of proof that the pollution had occurred before the lien date, and that a knowledgeable buyer would have inspected the property for toxic pollution. County of San Diego 45 Cal. In light of these well-established principles, we agree with Firestone that the board's function was limited to determining the fair market value of Firestone's property, and that its finding on the hazardous waste issue is erroneous as a matter of law.
In support of the board's conclusion, however, Monterey County proposes a variety of arguments in support of its position that pollution cleanup costs do not affect a property's fair market value. Carlson v. I Cal. The county's argument is unpersuasive, however. Pollution is not akin to the private deed restrictions in Carlson, or to the below-market rental agreement in Clayton v.
County of Los Angeles 26 Cal. Monterey County sells tax deed properties at the Monterey County tax sale auction which is held annually during the month of April each year. Monterey County relies on the revenue generated from real estate property taxes to fund daily services.
Monterey County, CA Property Tax information
Unpaid real estate taxes creates a serious cash-flow problem for Monterey County. The sale of tax deed properties at the Monterey County tax sale auction generates the revenue Monterey County needs to continue to fund important government services like police protection, public schooling, and emergency medical services. When you buy Monterey County tax deed properties you are helping the community. The money you pay to purchase these tax deed properties generates the much needed revenue Monterey County needs to pay for essential public services.
The first half of real estate property taxes are due on November 1 and are delinquent after December 10th of each year. The second half of real estate property taxes are due on February 1 of the following year and are delinquent after April 10th of that year. On or before June 8th, the Monterey County tax collector will post a notice of impending default for failure to pay property taxes on real estate for which taxes have not been paid in full by the close of business on June 30th.
At a. On or before September 8th, the Monterey County tax collector will publish in a newspaper of general circulation an affidavit stating that real estate on which the taxes, assessments, penalties, and costs have not been fully paid are in default. After the property has become tax defaulted, five years or more, or three years or more in the case of nonresidential commercial property, the Monterey County tax collector shall have the power to sell and shall attempt to sell all or any portion of tax-defaulted property that has not been redeemed.
Approximately 21 days prior to the date of the Monterey County tax sale the Monterey County tax collector will publish the notice of intended sale once a week for three successive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation published in the city of Salinas and in a newspaper of general circulation published in the judicial district of Monterey County. You can obtain a copy of the Monterey County tax sale list from the Monterey County tax collector. In addition, a digital copy of the tax sale list may also be available for immediate download on the Monterey County tax collector's website.
Anyone wishing to bid must register before the Monterey County California tax sale.
Paying too much? Comparing property tax rates for L.A. County cities
Generally, there is no charge for registration. While there is no charge to register prospective bidders may be required to post a deposit preceding the Monterey County tax sale. Upon successfully meeting the registration requirements the Monterey County Tax Collector's office will assign each bidder a number to identify each bidder when purchasing tax deed properties from Monterey County. In addition, the Monterey County Tax Collector's office advises bidders to arrange for their deposits early to make sure they are eligible to bid.
Furthermore, the Monterey County Tax Collector's office will not be registering bidders nor accepting bids and all questions will be directed to the county tax sale auction website. The Monterey County California tax sale in an online tax sale auction and is held annually during the month of April. In accordance with California law the Monterey County Tax Collector will commence the public auction of properties for which the taxes, interest, and fees have not been paid and continue's from day to day until each property is sold to satisfy the taxes, interest, costs, and charges.
In accordance with California law the Monterey County Tax Collector must sell tax delinquent properties to the highest bidder at the public tax sale auction.
Premium Bid Method : In a public oral bid tax sale where Monterey County California is utilizing the Premium Bid Method the winning bidder at the Monterey County California tax sale is the bidder who pays the largest amount in excess of the delinquent taxes, delinquent interest, and fees. The excess amount shall be credited to the county general fund. Payment is due on or before the close of the tax sale auction. The deposit shall be applied toward the purchase price of the property.
Failure on the part of the successful bidder to consummate the sale on or before the close of the tax sale auction shall result in the forfeiture of the deposit and all rights he or she may have with respect to that property.